The portraits above are of the same man but in two different incarnations. On the far left we see Martin "Gray" in retirement after a successful career peddling fake antiques to gullible collectors. He is holding his mass market paperback, For Those I Loved, which is filled with his exploits as a saintly "Holocaust Survivor" who was supposedly forced to help clear bodies out of the Treblinka "gas chamber." The earlier portrait is of the youthful Gray as a highly-decorated officer in the Soviet NKVD (the savage forerunner of the KGB, responsible for the murder of millions of Christians in Russia and Eastern Europe). Even Establishment researchers have had to admit that Gray's book is as phony as the antiques he peddled. But Gray's scam is symbolic of countless other Communist ghouls who have managed to land on their feet in the West, disguised as poor, persecuted "Survivors of the Holocaust" and feted as the saints and martyrs of the universe. Meanwhile the holocaust they perpetrated against millions of Christians slips further down the dark environs of Orwell's memory hole.
Interesting times readers. Thanks to resident Zionist Agent and Government collaborator @ndy we came across this HERE.
Now it would seem that even the Left/Anarchists are starting to rise from their slumber. Over the past 60 years maybe longer the Australian Anarchists and Marxist movement has been run by Zionist Jews. All with one purpose. To do their bidding.But their is a new kid on the block. National Anarchism. And the Marxist Jews are very upset.
What do you expect? Any credibility they had (none) was shot to pieces when they branched into Anti Racism. They outed themselves and the Australian Left has witnessed it all from the sidelines.
So much fun to be had. @ndy it would seem has lost his crown. The Anarchist movement in Australia and around the world is well and truly changing.
So whats this all about? Well it would seem that if anyone from the Left writes an article and quotes anyone from NA they are instantly attacked by a small group of big mouths. Notably all Fight Dem Back members.
The next move from the Zionist Anarchist at Fight Dem back is to try and smear the unsuspecting NA member via Fraudulent Anarchist sites such as this. Here. Then its the rally cry for all the Sayanim to jump onto the comments section of the original story and threaten and deceive. Next the author of said article will be branded a NAZI collaborator by these paper Anarchists.
One look at these fakes is usually enough for any real Anarchist. Another thing of note is the amount of Anarchists, Marxist and other assorted Left Wing followers who are converting to Nationalism. The hypocrisy in the current Left Wing movement all be it from self appointed leaders has grown to such an extent that even the most ardent supporters are thinking twice. Do you blame them.
Here is some great comments from the Left Wing or Anarchist followers concerning @ndy and his dislike of National Anarchists.
Looks like it wont be long until someone gives up this Fraud and feeds him to the Evil Fascists. I'm hungry.
• Jeremy, on May 31st, 2009 at 12:47 pm said:
Its also pretty clear what the plan of the larger anarchist group is, to delegitimise the smaller and kill off a possible competitor.
I would suggest to those people involved in the “National anarchists” that a name change might be in order, it would also move you further away from any far right past or associations and make you less of a target for the quite frankly very aggressive larger anarchist group.
Having a look around the web some of these more mainstream anarchist groups quite openly want to kill you. I would be against this as I favour free speech and the fig leaf of “No platform” is clearly just that, a figleaf to cover up the quite fascist activities of people like this @ndy and his friends.
I would advise you to get out of this politics business all together, or at least change your name, these people who hate you, aside from thier high minded words, are quite clearly intolerant murderous fascists in the best traditions of Hitler and Stalin.
• Simon, on May 31st, 2009 at 1:49 pm said:
Although you say you fight against fascism, your very own school of thought is far more fascist than that of the National-Anarchists.
Please feel free to point out which part of National-Anarchism you see as fascist.
• Punk, on May 31st, 2009 at 5:22 pm said:
I agree with Jeremy that the N-Aers chose an unfortunate name. ‘Tribal anarchism’ would have been a better term than ‘national’, because many people seem to associate the word ‘national’ with the nation state.
I also agree that @ndy and co. are in the tradition of Hitler and Stalin, though of course @ndy wouldn’t get his own hands dirty, he’d just be the one denouncing people behind the scenes to the thought police, or the ‘antifa’ thugs. In Europe @ndy’s ‘antifa’ friends go round beating up skinny goth kids with iron bars for wearing the wrong kind of band t-shirt. They even bashed the singer of old-school punk band ‘The Exploited’!
Kumo, your misuse of the word ‘fascism’ is embarrassing. Look it up on Wikipedia for a basic definition. It means someone who believes in a one-party STATE, therefore someone who doesn’t believe in the State at all can’t be fascist, can they?
Who said anything about enforcing separatism? From what the N-Aers have said, it’s a philosophy of VOLUNTARY separatism. As most people prefer to live among their own kind, there would be no need to use force. Furthermore, the N-Aers have said they also support the existence of multi-cultural communities, for those who want to live in a multi-cultural society. So everybody should be happy. What’s the problem?
My ideal of communal anarchism is not vague confused dribble, as you put it. Communities have a way of organising themselves, it’s organic. As for trade and commerce, obviously it wouldn’t be the same as now but is that a bad thing? Capitalism and consumerism is destroying the earth’s resources, yet it seems you want that to keep happening.
Your own views are incoherent. How are you going to organise your kind of ‘anarchism’ on a large scale without a government to enforce it? Just face it, you’re a socialist, not an anarchist.
You should join Socialist Alliance or one of those groups, you’d be more at home there than pretending to be an anarchist.
• Heathen Anarchist, on May 31st, 2009 at 12:13 pm said:
Associating with members of a certain group does not make one a supporter of that group’s activities or ideology.
National anarchism is not so dogmatic as to not allow any of us to associate with whoever we want.
Why do you care who Scott associates with anyway? I guess so you can go report it to your zionist establishment mates (the thought police) over at Fight Dem Back.
You’re not at all working against the system @ndy, only for it.
• Punk, on May 31st, 2009 at 10:46 am said:
I am a communal anarchist. I believe in community. Small-scale community, not large scale ’societies’. That’s what the National-Anarchists believe in also, so we can work together on certain issues.
Communties work their own issues out, they don’t need outsiders coming in and telling them how to distribute their wealth. There s a place for each person in the community. If someone doesn’t fit in (murderer, rapist etc.) then they are expelled.
@ndy claims he doesn’t recognise N-Aers as anarchists, but Andy only speaks for a very small fraction of the anarchists in Australia (basically the snobs who run Barricade Books in Melbourne).
He doesn’t have a monopoly on what ‘anarchism’ is. I in turn don’t recognise HIS views as anarchist, because they are basically socialist. ‘Libertarian socialism’ is not anarchism. But some people believe it is. Whatever…that’s their problem.
@ndy’s constant reference to people’s age is quite bizarre.
Do you have to be over a certain age to be an anarchist now, do you, @ndy? I’ll be sure to tell all my friends under the age of 25 (and most of the people reading this article) that they can’t join the club!
Old man @ndy has spoken! Hear him roar!
Anonymous, on May 26th, 2009 at 7:09 pm said:
Lol @ndy you nerdy, whinging twat!!!
RE National Anarchists #
Social-Alt09, on May 29th, 2009 at 5:05 pm said:
I saw these guys at the censorship rally in Melbourne. I went to talk to them but I was told I wasn’t allowed to talk to them. They seem legitimate enough to me, and I like the idea of ethnic nationalism.
Alistair, on May 29th, 2009 at 5:20 pm said:
I used not to take anarchists very seriously, as they either were simply negative or worked in fact for the state and establish under the cover of “anarchy” - as some indeed still do.